vs
9.7Display9.7
2.4Memory & storage4.4
4.8Battery & portability7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) | Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 253 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 27 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.4 kg+4%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Thickness28 mm vs 27 mm+4%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 253 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.0
vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)6.67.0
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.68.4vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)