vs
3.2Display8.3
8.0Memory & storage5.7
7.6Battery & portability2.1
6.4Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) | Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 245.2 mm | 265 mm | −19.8 mm |
| Width | 359.3 mm | 402 mm | −42.7 mm |
| Thickness | 23.1 mm | 29 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 64 GB+50%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight2.1 kg vs 2.8 kg+33%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Thickness23.1 mm vs 29 mm+26%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Battery capacity55 Wh vs 73 Wh+32%
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SD card readerNo · Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+13%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 60 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 15 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,167 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,357 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,544 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 597 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 65% | — |
| Response time | 23 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 43% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 55 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 23.1 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 359.3 mm | 402 mm |
| Depth | 245.2 mm | 265 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 50 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.8
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.6
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)
vs
XMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsXMG Apex 16 RTX 5070 (2026)6.68.6
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)6.66.6
