NewMSI Katana 15 HX C14W RTX 5060 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026) vs Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026) vs MSI Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

What Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026) does better (3) and where Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) wins (18) — every spec side by side.

MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026)
9.1Score
3 advantages≈ $2,600
vs
MSI Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
9.5Score
18 advantages≈ $3,600
Higher score
7.8Graphics8.9
8.8Overall performance9.5
8.7Display8.6
9.6Memory & storage9.6
6.7Battery & portability5.7
6.4Features & cooling9.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026)Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
363 × 269.725.4357.2 × 284.128.6
Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026)Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Difference
Depth269.7 mm284.1 mm−14.4 mm
Width363 mm357.2 mm+5.8 mm
Thickness25.4 mm28.6 mm−3.2 mm
Weight2.3 kg2.7 kg−0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026) better than Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?

  1. Weight2.3 kg vs 2.7 kg+17%
  2. Thickness25.4 mm vs 28.6 mm+13%
  3. USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%

Why is Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026)?

  1. Battery capacity80 Wh vs 100 Wh+25%
  2. GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
  3. Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,059 vs 2,005+89%
  4. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,086 vs 20,327+35%
  5. Geekbench 6 multi-core15,926 vs 21,127+33%
  6. GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+19%
  7. Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  8. CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
  9. GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
  10. RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  11. SD card readerNo · Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
  12. IR camera (face login)No · Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)115 W140 W
Video memory8 GB12 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores4,6085,888
GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS31.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,08620,327
Processor
ProcessorCore i7-14650HXCore Ultra 9 275HX
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores1624
CPU threads2424
Max CPU clock5.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Processor optionsCore i7-14650HX, Core i9-14900HXCore Ultra 9 275HX
Geekbench 6 multi-core15,92621,127
Geekbench 6 single-core2,7713,168
Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,0592,005
Display
Screen size16″16″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness—400 nits
Response time3 ms3 ms
DCI-P3 coverage100%100%
Pixel density189 ppi189 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncNoNo
Advanced Optimus—No
MUX switch—Yes
HDR—No
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)96 GB96 GB
RAM (base)16 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz6,400 MHz
Max. supported RAM96 GB96 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)4,096 GB4,096 GB
SSD (base)1,024 GB1,024 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity80 Wh100 Wh
Power adapter240 W330 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power100 W140 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.3 kg2.7 kg
Thickness25.4 mm28.6 mm
Width363 mm357.2 mm
Depth269.7 mm284.1 mm
Body materialPlasticAluminium, Plastic
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4USB4Thunderbolt 5
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports32
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlightZone RGBZone RGB
Per-key RGBNoNo
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel1.7 mm—
Webcam720p1,080p
IR camera (face login)NoYes
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2.02.2
Dolby AtmosNoNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare