vs
3.5Battery & portability2.5
8.4Features & cooling4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023)
| Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 284 mm | −15 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 397 mm | −40 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 25.9 mm | +4.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Weight2.37 kg vs 2.8 kg+18%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- SD card readerYes · Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Vector GP77 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thickness30 mm vs 25.9 mm+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | — | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 11,360 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | — | Core i7-13700H |
| CPU maker | — | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 14 |
| CPU threads | — | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i7-13700H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,607 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,733 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 819 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | — | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | — | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | — | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | — | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | — | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 65 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.37 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 25.9 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 397 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 284 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 57 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ 16APH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.56.6
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.76.6
vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.6
vsLenovo Legion Slim 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.6
vsAcer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.6
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.96.6