vs
3.5Battery & portability4.5
8.4Features & cooling2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 273 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 398 mm | −41 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 27.2 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Weight2.37 kg vs 2.66 kg+12%
- SD card readerYes · Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thickness30 mm vs 27.2 mm+10%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | — | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 13,716 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | — | Core i7-12650H |
| CPU maker | — | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 10 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i7-12650H, Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 11,204 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,471 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 772 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | — | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | No |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | — | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | — | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | — | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | — | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.37 kg | 2.66 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 27.2 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 273 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ 16APH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.56.7
vsDell G15 5530 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.56.7
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.7
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)7.06.7
vsLenovo Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.7
vsMSI Crosshair 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.66.7