vs
2.0Memory & storage2.5
7.0Battery & portability6.5
2.2Features & cooling3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)
| Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022) | Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 242 mm | 250 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022) better than Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
Why is Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)?
- RAM (up to)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 2,560+25%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR4 vs DDR5
- Thickness24 mm vs 23 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 40 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 8.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 6,316 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12450H | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-13420H, Core i7-13620H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 63% |
| Response time | — | 18 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 42% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 54 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 242 mm | 250 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 56.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i Gen 7 15 RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)3.83.9
vs
Dell G15 5525 RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)4.03.9
vs
HP Victus 15 Intel RTX 2050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)3.93.9
vs
HP Victus 15 Intel GTX 1650 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)3.83.9
vs
HP Victus 15 Intel RTX 3050 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Crawler E30 RTX 2050 (2022)4.03.9
vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)3.83.8
