pan.tf
Compare
Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) vs Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)

Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) vs MSI Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)

What Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) does better (7) and where Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Medion · 2022Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)

7.2Score

7 advantages≈ $2,150

Higher score

MSI · 2022Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)

5.4Score

4 advantages

5.5Memory & storage6.9

8.8Battery & portability5.3

3.6Features & cooling2.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)

	Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)	Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)	Difference
Depth	262 mm	273 mm	−11 mm
Width	395 mm	398 mm	−3 mm
Thickness	26 mm	24.2 mm	+1.8 mm
Weight	2.3 kg	2.7 kg	−0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) better than Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?

Video memory64 GB vs 4 GB16×
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Weight2.3 kg vs 2.66 kg+16%
RAM (base)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 512 GB3.9×
HDMI 2.1Yes · Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022): No
SD card readerYes · Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022): No

Why is Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)?

CPU cores8 vs 14+75%
Thickness26 mm vs 24.2 mm+7%
SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB+2%
Max CPU clock4.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)≈ $2,1507.2	MSI Pulse GL76 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)5.4
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop	GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	105 W
Video memory	64 GB	4 GB
Video memory type	—	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	—	2,560
GPU compute (FP32)	—	9.5 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	6,263
Processor
Processor	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Core i7-12700H
CPU maker	AMD	Intel
CPU cores	8	14
CPU threads	—	20
Max CPU clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz
Processor options	—	Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	11,922
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	2,491
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	1,113
Display
Screen size	17.3″	17.3″
Resolution	2560 × 1440	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	144 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Pixel density	—	127 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	No
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	64 GB
RAM (base)	64 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR4	DDR4
RAM speed	—	3,200 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	64 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	2,000 GB	2,048 GB
SSD (base)	2,000 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	91 Wh	90 Wh
Power adapter	—	240 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	No
Design & cooling
Weight	2.3 kg	2.66 kg
Thickness	26 mm	24.2 mm
Width	395 mm	398 mm
Depth	262 mm	273 mm
Body material	—	Plastic
Colours	Black	Gray
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	58.3 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	—	1
USB-A ports	—	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1	Yes	No
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	—	5.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Webcam	—	720p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	—	2.0
Dolby Atmos	—	No