pan.tf
Compare
Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) vs Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)

Medion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) vs MSI Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)

What Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) does better (8) and where Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Medion · 2022Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)

5.7Score

8 advantages≈ $2,600

Higher score

MSI · 2022Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)

5.5Score

5 advantages

2.6Memory & storage7.4

8.8Battery & portability2.6

3.2Features & cooling4.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)

	Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)	Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)	Difference
Depth	262 mm	273 mm	−11 mm
Width	395 mm	398 mm	−3 mm
Thickness	26 mm	25.2 mm	+0.8 mm
Weight	2.3 kg	2.6 kg	−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) better than Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)?

Battery capacity91 Wh vs 54 Wh+70%
Video memory32 GB vs 6 GB5.3×
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Weight2.3 kg vs 2.6 kg+13%
GPU shader cores5,120 vs 3,840+33%
RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
SD card readerYes · Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022): No
SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%

Why is Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022) better than Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)?

RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Thickness26 mm vs 25.2 mm+3%
Max CPU clock4.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Medion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)≈ $2,6005.7	MSI Sword 17 RTX 3060 (2022)5.5
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	105 W
Video memory	32 GB	6 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	5,120	3,840
GPU compute (FP32)	—	12.6 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	8,436
Processor
Processor	Core i7-11800H	Core i7-12650H
CPU maker	Intel	Intel
CPU cores	8	10
CPU threads	—	16
Max CPU clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz
Processor options	—	Core i7-12650H, Core i7-13620H
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	10,837
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	2,352
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	739
Display
Screen size	17.3″	17.3″
Resolution	2560 × 1440	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	144 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Brightness	—	300 nits
Pixel density	—	127 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Advanced Optimus	—	Yes
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	64 GB
RAM (base)	32 GB	16 GB
RAM type	—	DDR5
RAM speed	—	5,200 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	64 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	2,048 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	91 Wh	54 Wh
Power adapter	—	200 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.3 kg	2.6 kg
Thickness	26 mm	25.2 mm
Width	395 mm	398 mm
Depth	262 mm	273 mm
Colours	—	White
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	—	1
USB-A ports	—	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.1	5.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Webcam	—	720p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2.0
Dolby Atmos	—	No