Medion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) vs Medion Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)
What Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) does better (9) and where Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Memory & storage2.2
8.8Battery & portability9.7
3.2Features & cooling4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)
| Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) | Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 262 mm | 240 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 360 mm | +35 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 23 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) better than Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Video memory32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 15.6″+11%
- Max CPU clock4.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz+10%
Why is Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) better than Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.2 kg+5%
- Thickness26 mm vs 23 mm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,120 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-11800H | Ryzen 5 5600H |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR4 |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 91 Wh | 93 Wh |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 262 mm | 240 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.05.7
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)6.05.7
vs
Dell G15 5525 RTX 3070 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.75.7
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 3060 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.85.7
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58 RTX 3060 (2022)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.85.7

