vs
2.7Memory & storage8.8
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Titan GT77 HX RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Video memory24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,424+41%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
- Screen size18″ vs 17.3″+4%
Why is Titan GT77 HX RTX 4080 (2023) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 37.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 21,674 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-13950HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 17,215 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,108 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 2,023 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | — | 600 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 95% |
| Pixel density | — | 255 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 128 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 4 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 3 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 3.3 kg |
| Thickness | — | 23 mm |
| Width | — | 397 mm |
| Depth | — | 330 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 4 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 61 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)vs
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2W RTX 5080 (2026)
vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5080 (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsRazer Blade 18 RTX 5080 (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)