vs
2.7Memory & storage9.3
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Raider 18 HX RTX 4090 (2024)?
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 9,728+8%
Why is Raider 18 HX RTX 4090 (2024) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 192 GB6×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB4.1×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.8 GHz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 27,410 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 20,328 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,343 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,954 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 192 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 4 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 3.6 kg |
| Thickness | — | 32 mm |
| Width | — | 404 mm |
| Depth | — | 307.5 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 62.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 4.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)vs
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2W RTX 5080 (2026)
vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5080 (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
vsRazer Blade 18 RTX 5080 (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)