vs
2.4Memory & storage6.4
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Blade 18 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity99 Wh vs 92 Wh+8%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
Why is Blade 18 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB4.1×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 37.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 21,942 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 22,639 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,281 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 2,115 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | — | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 92 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 3.1 kg |
| Thickness | — | 27.9 mm |
| Width | — | 400 mm |
| Depth | — | 275.4 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 66.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | — | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 4.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsMSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsMSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)