vs
2.4Memory & storage8.5
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Raider A18 HX RTX 4090 (2024)?
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
Why is Raider A18 HX RTX 4090 (2024) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB4.1×
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 9,728+27%
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 26,551 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 19,648 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,162 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,995 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 3.6 kg |
| Thickness | — | 32 mm |
| Width | — | 404 mm |
| Depth | — | 307.5 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 4.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
MSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)

