Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) vs MSI Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5060 (2025)
What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) does better (9) and where Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5060 (2025) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Memory & storage7.9
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity99 Wh vs 55 Wh+79%
- Refresh rate300 Hz vs 144 Hz2.1×
- CPU cores24 vs 64×
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 3,3282.3×
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.5 GHz vs 5 GHz+10%
Why is Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5060 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB+2%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 55 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 10.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 9,318 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen 5 240 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen 5 240, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen 9 270 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,779 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,343 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 634 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 55 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | — | 22.2 mm |
| Width | — | 399.3 mm |
| Depth | — | 258 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsXMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)