Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) vs MSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)
What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) does better (10) and where Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Memory & storage9.5
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026)?
- Refresh rate300 Hz vs 144 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity99 Wh vs 60 Wh+65%
- CPU cores24 vs 102.4×
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 3,3282.3×
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.5 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+6%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5060 (2026) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 100 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 16.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 11,735 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core 7 240H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 10 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core 7 240H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,249 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,437 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 846 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 180 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2 kg |
| Thickness | — | 22.9 mm |
| Width | — | 359 mm |
| Depth | — | 249 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsXMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)