- pan.tf
- Compare
- Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (1) and where Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Memory & storage9.2
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity99 Wh vs 90 Wh+10%
Why is Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 8,000 GB8×
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 48 GB+50%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 8,000 GB8×
- HDMI 2.1No · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 48 GB+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 19,432 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 285HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | — |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Pixel density | — | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 8,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 8,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | — | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | — | 29 mm |
| Width | — | 357 mm |
| Depth | — | 284 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 49 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)