vs
3.2Memory & storage2.4
8.3Battery & portability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
| LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025) | Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 236 mm | 247 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 359.2 mm | 361 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 24 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 2.2 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025) better than Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity58 Wh vs 53 Wh+8%
- Weight1.8 kg vs 2.25 kg+25%
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 24 mm+5%
- SSD (up to)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) better than LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 9.6 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,664 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Core 7 250H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 5 150, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 170 | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,075 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 1,947 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 600 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 27 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 58 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 359.2 mm | 361 mm |
| Depth | 236 mm | 247 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5050 (2025)4.54.5vs
Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)4.64.5vs
Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)vsXMG Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)4.54.6vs
Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B2RW RTX 5050 (2025)4.54.3