vs
4.3Battery & portability3.5
4.4Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)
| LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023) | Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264.8 mm | 269 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 359.6 mm | 357 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 25.2 mm | 30 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.4 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thickness25.2 mm vs 30 mm+19%
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- SD card readerNo · LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 95 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | — |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 11.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,964 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 7640HS | — |
| CPU maker | AMD | — |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,549 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,502 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 752 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | — |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 350 nits | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | — |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | — |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | — |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | — |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | — |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.37 kg |
| Thickness | 25.2 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 359.6 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 264.8 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)4.94.7
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 17 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)4.95.2
vs
Gigabyte G5 RTX 4050 (2023)vsLenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)4.74.9
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Bravo 15 RTX 4050 (2023)4.94.9
vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 RTX 3050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.96.6
vs
Dell G15 5530 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.56.6
