NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)

Lenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) vs MSI Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)

What LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (13) and where Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Lenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)
4.7Score
13 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
MSI Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)
4.5Score
11 advantages≈ $1,450
4.1Graphics5.7
3.5Overall performance5.4
6.2Display2.3
2.9Memory & storage3.2
5.6Battery & portability2.3
5.0Features & cooling3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)
360 × 25924398 × 27325
LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)Difference
Depth259 mm273 mm−14 mm
Width360 mm398 mm−38 mm
Thickness24 mm25 mm−1 mm
Weight2.4 kg2.6 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)?

  1. RAM (up to)24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity60 Wh vs 54 Wh+12%
  3. Weight2.38 kg vs 2.6 kg+9%
  4. G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023): No
  5. Advanced OptimusYes · Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023): No
  6. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023): No
  7. Brightness300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
  8. DCI-P3 coverage78% vs 41%+90%
  9. Thickness24 mm vs 25 mm+4%
  10. sRGB coverage100% vs 61%+64%
  11. RAM (base)24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
  12. Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%

Why is Katana 17 B13 RTX 4060 (2023) better than LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)?

  1. SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
  2. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,119 vs 11,168+38%
  3. CPU cores6 vs 10+67%
  4. GPU compute (FP32)11.7 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS+18%
  5. Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  6. Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  7. GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
  8. SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
  9. Key travel1.5 mm vs 1.7 mm+13%
  10. Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
  11. RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,200 MHz+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4050 LaptopGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)105 W105 W
Video memory6 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
GPU shader cores2,5603,072
GPU compute (FP32)11.7 TFLOPS13.8 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,11911,168
Processor
ProcessorRyzen 7 7435HSCore i7-13620H
CPU makerAMDIntel
CPU cores610
Max CPU clock5 GHz4.9 GHz
Processor optionsRyzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HSCore i7-12650H, Core i7-13620H, Core i9-13900H
Display
Screen size15.6″17.3″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits250 nits
sRGB coverage100%61%
Response time—30 ms
DCI-P3 coverage78%41%
Pixel density141 ppi127 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesNo
Advanced OptimusYesNo
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)24 GB16 GB
RAM (base)24 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed4,800 MHz5,200 MHz
Max. supported RAM32 GB64 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)512 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)512 GB1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity60 Wh54 Wh
Power adapter170 W200 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesNo
Design & cooling
Weight2.38 kg2.6 kg
Thickness24 mm25 mm
Width360 mm398 mm
Depth259 mm273 mm
Body materialPlasticPlastic
ColoursGreyBlack
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)—59.1 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4NoNo
USB-C ports11
USB-A ports33
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.15.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel1.5 mm1.7 mm
Webcam1,080p720p
IR camera (face login)NoNo
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2 speakers
Dolby AtmosNoNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare