Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Memory & storage2.6
Why is LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 99 Wh+65%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 5,888+77%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,712 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | — |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.6 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,315 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,362 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 790 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 27 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 67% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 170 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | — |
| Thickness | 24 mm | — |
| Width | 360 mm | — |
| Depth | 259 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,440p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.46.7vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 3050 (2024)6.44.2vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)6.44.7
vsAlienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.4
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)6.66.4
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)