vs
2.9Memory & storage2.7
7.2Battery & portability8.3
4.8Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)
| Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023) | Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 249 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 359 mm | +10 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 60 Wh+17%
- CPU cores12 vs 8+50%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Screen size16.1″ vs 15.6″+3%
- Max CPU clock4.7 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Why is Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) better than Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Weight2.33 kg vs 1.98 kg+18%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,998 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500H | Core i5-13420H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 98% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 67% | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.33 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 249 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.3 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4060 (2023)4.94.9
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)5.24.9
vsGigabyte G7 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)5.24.9vs
HP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 16 RTX 3050 (2023)4.95.2vs
HP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)vsLenovo LOQ 15IRH8 RTX 4050 (2023)4.94.8
vsGigabyte G5 RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)4.84.9