HP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Memory & storage2.6
Why is Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 99 Wh+41%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,8882.3×
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.5 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,270 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.6 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13420H, Core 5 210H, Ryzen AI 5 340, Core i7-13620H, Core 7 240H, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350 | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,167 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,226 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 516 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 64% | — |
| Response time | 17 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 45% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.29 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | — |
| Width | 357.9 mm | — |
| Depth | 255 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Pink | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 48 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)5.35.3
vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)5.35.3vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2024)5.36.5
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2024)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)3.95.3
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)