vs
4.7Display4.2
6.7Memory & storage2.1
7.5Battery & portability7.0
3.9Features & cooling2.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023)
| Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024) | Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 255 mm | 255 mm | = |
| Width | 357.9 mm | 358 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 24 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Thickness23.5 mm vs 24 mm+2%
Why is Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023) better than Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- Video memory4 GB vs 16 GB4×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | — |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 4,151 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Core i5-13420H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,580 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,738 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 752 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.29 kg | 2.29 kg |
| Thickness | 23.5 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 357.9 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 255 mm | 255 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.1vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)5.14.8vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.15.0
vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)4.15.1
vs
HP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023)6.54.2