vs
8.8Display9.2
5.5Memory & storage3.7
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 80 Wh+4%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 42 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,849 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.68 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 61.1 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.59.2
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.19.2vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.29.4vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.29.1