vs
5.1Display4.2
2.9Memory & storage2.2
2.5Battery & portability2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) | Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 276 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 396 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 35 mm | −7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 53 Wh+57%
- Thickness28 mm vs 35 mm+25%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)?
Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 4.5 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,046 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 396 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)3.83.6vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)3.84.0vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender P15 RTX 5060 (2025)3.83.6vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)3.84.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)3.83.8vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)3.83.6