vs
3.3Graphics7.9
2.2Overall performance8.3
5.1Display6.4
2.8Memory & storage4.5
2.5Battery & portability2.4
6.0Features & cooling3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) | LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 276 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 398 mm | = |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 25 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.9 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) better than LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 60 Wh+38%
- IR camera (face login)Yes · LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)4.5 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS5.8×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,046 vs 15,8623.1×
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- Thickness28 mm vs 25 mm+12%
- USB-A ports3 vs 4+33%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 4.5 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,046 | 15,862 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core i7-14700HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.9 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 3050 (2025)3.84.0
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)3.84.2
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)3.83.6
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)3.84.0
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)3.83.5
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)3.85.3

