vs
6.5Graphics8.2
6.4Overall performance7.2
5.1Display5.1
6.3Memory & storage6.3
2.4Battery & portability2.4
6.5Features & cooling6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024) | Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 277.9 mm | = |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 397.5 mm | = |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 30 mm | = |
| Weight | 3 kg | 3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2024)?
Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)16 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+36%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light11,179 vs 13,967+25%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,179 | 13,967 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,027 | 12,027 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,856 | 2,856 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 769 | 769 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.95 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 397.5 mm |
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 277.9 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)6.06.3vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.36.5
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)6.36.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)7.66.3vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)6.36.4vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Creator M16 HX RTX 4060 (2024)6.36.3