HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Memory & storage2.6
Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 99 Wh+41%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,8882.3×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.7 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,560 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | — |
| CPU threads | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,432 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,779 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,021 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | — |
| Width | 357.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)