vs
9.7Display9.1
2.6Memory & storage5.3
3.7Battery & portability7.8
7.2Features & cooling9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)
| Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 270 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 363 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.4 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)?
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,680+37%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026) better than Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 92 Wh+31%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026): Yes
- Ethernet1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s5×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 42 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 24,199 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core Ultra 7 251HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 128 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 92 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.48 kg | 2.45 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 363 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 270 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.37.1
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.17.1
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.07.1vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.17.2
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.27.1
vsLenovo LOQ 15AHP11 RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.17.1