vs
9.7Display9.8
3.4Memory & storage3.4
3.8Battery & portability6.0
7.0Features & cooling9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
| Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026) | Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 260 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 357 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 28 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Weight2.48 kg vs 2.65 kg+7%
- Thickness26 mm vs 28 mm+8%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5+20%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)?
- Brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 100 Wh+43%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026): Yes
- Video memory16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Ethernet1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s5×
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 10,496+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 10,496 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.48 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 260 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.67.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)6.37.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.17.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.37.3
vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.67.3
vsLenovo LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.67.3