vs
9.1Display8.2
2.6Memory & storage9.2
3.7Battery & portability4.7
7.2Features & cooling2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 262 mm | +7 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 359 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB4×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 75 Wh+7%
- Weight2.48 kg vs 2.4 kg+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 450, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.48 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 262 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)6.66.4
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)7.06.6
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
vs
MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)6.56.6
vs
Lenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)7.06.6
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)7.26.6

