vs
7.8Display6.4
2.8Memory & storage2.7
8.6Battery & portability3.6
4.8Features & cooling9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)Raider A18 HX A9 RTX 5080 (2025)
| Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) | Raider A18 HX A9 RTX 5080 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 308 mm | −45 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 404 mm | −46 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 32 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 3.6 kg | −1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Raider A18 HX A9 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Weight2.2 kg vs 3.6 kg+64%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Thickness23 mm vs 32 mm+39%
Why is Raider A18 HX A9 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Brightness300 nits vs 1,000 nits3.3×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 99 Wh+30%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- Ethernet1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s5×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Screen size16″ vs 18″+12%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 7,680 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 10 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 3.6 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 32 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 404 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 308 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.66.8vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.6vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Core 15 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.7
vsMSI VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.96.8
vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.86.8