vs
7.8Display2.4
2.6Memory & storage3.5
8.6Battery & portability7.0
4.7Features & cooling3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)Victus 15 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)
| Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) | Victus 15 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 255 mm | +8 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 358 mm | = |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 24 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Victus 15 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?
- Video memory32 GB vs 4 GB8×
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 2,5603×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 70 Wh+9%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.29 kg+4%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- Brightness300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
- Thickness23 mm vs 24 mm+4%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz+18%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Victus 15 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 250 nits |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.29 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 255 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.9
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.46.7
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.86.7
vs
MSI VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.96.7
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.66.7

