vs
8.1Display4.2
3.8Memory & storage3.2
8.6Battery & portability6.4
4.7Features & cooling2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 240 mm | +23 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 360 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 24 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.1 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 53 Wh+43%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR4
- Thickness23 mm vs 24 mm+4%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.1 kg+5%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.9 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR4 |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 240 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.17.3
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.87.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.67.3
vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.37.3
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.37.3
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.45.0