vs
3.1Battery & portability2.1
5.0Features & cooling2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
G6 RTX 4050 (2023)Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)
| G6 RTX 4050 (2023) | Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 265 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 397 mm | −38 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 31 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G6 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.8 kg+22%
- Thickness26 mm vs 31 mm+19%
Why is Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023) better than G6 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.5 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,364 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13620H | — |
| CPU maker | Intel | — |
| CPU cores | 10 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500H, Core i7-12650H, Core i7-13620H | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | — |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | — |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | — |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 54 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | No | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 397 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 265 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023)4.04.2vs
Gigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4060 (2023)4.04.2
vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)3.94.0
vsGigabyte G5 RTX 4050 (2024)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)6.44.0vsGigabyte G5 RTX 4060 (2024)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)6.84.0vs
Gigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4060 (2024)4.06.6