vs
6.9Memory & storage2.6
6.3Battery & portability8.8
5.2Features & cooling3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)
| G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) | Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 238 mm | 262 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 395 mm | −35 mm |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 26 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight1.99 kg vs 2.3 kg+16%
- CPU cores12 vs 8+50%
- Thickness23.9 mm vs 26 mm+9%
Why is Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022) better than G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?
- Battery capacity54 Wh vs 91 Wh+69%
- Video memory4 GB vs 32 GB8×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,1202×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
- Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,120 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 11.3 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,621 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12500H | Core i7-11800H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12500H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,576 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,195 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 766 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR4 | — |
| RAM speed | 3,200 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 54 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | No | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.99 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 23.9 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 238 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022)5.65.7
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-46 RTX 3060 (2022)vsGigabyte G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)5.65.6
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-42 RTX 3070 (2022)vsGigabyte G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)5.65.6
vsGigabyte G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsGigabyte G5 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)4.25.6
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7
vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.05.7