Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (2) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Memory & storage2.6
Why is Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,978 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 275HX | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 99 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | — |
| Thickness | 30 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 254 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 66.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.19.2vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Core 15 RTX 5070 (2025)9.19.2vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.19.0vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Core 15 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.2vs
Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Core 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.19.3