NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

Gigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023) vs HP Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

What Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (17) and where Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Gigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)
Gigabyte · 2023Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)
8.3Score
17 advantages≈ $4,200
Higher score
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)
6.1Score
6 advantages
7.8Graphics5.0
7.7Overall performance4.3
6.5Display4.9
7.1Memory & storage6.3
8.0Battery & portability7.2
7.5Features & cooling7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)
398 × 28322369 × 259.423.5
Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)Difference
Depth283 mm259.4 mm+23.6 mm
Width398 mm369 mm+29 mm
Thickness22 mm23.5 mm−1.5 mm
Weight2.8 kg2.4 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)?

  1. SSD (up to)16,000 GB vs 4,096 GB3.9×
  2. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,241 vs 7,882+68%
  3. GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS+63%
  4. Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
  5. Battery capacity99 Wh vs 83 Wh+19%
  6. GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
  7. RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  8. SSD (base)16,000 GB vs 512 GB31.2×
  9. Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  10. CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
  11. Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  12. SD card readerYes · Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023): No

Why is Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)?

  1. GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 145 W+4%
  2. Weight2.8 kg vs 2.44 kg+15%
  3. Advanced OptimusNo · Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
  4. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
  5. RAM speed5,200 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+8%
  6. Pixel density130 ppi vs 137 ppi+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4070 LaptopGeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)140 W145 W
Video memory8 GB6 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
GPU shader cores4,6082,560
GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS13.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,2417,882
Processor
ProcessorCore i7-13620HCore i5-13420H
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores108
CPU threads—12
Max CPU clock4.9 GHz4.6 GHz
Processor optionsCore i5-12500H, Core i7-13700HCore i5-13420H, Core i5-13500H, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7940HS
Geekbench 6 multi-core—9,343
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,241
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—524
Display
Screen size17.3″16.1″
Resolution2560 × 14401920 × 1080
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%—
Response time—7 ms
Pixel density130 ppi137 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
G-Sync / FreeSync—Yes
Advanced OptimusNoYes
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB32 GB
RAM (base)32 GB8 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,200 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB32 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)16,000 GB4,096 GB
SSD (base)16,000 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity99 Wh83 Wh
Power adapter240 W280 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
Design & cooling
Weight2.8 kg2.44 kg
Thickness22 mm23.5 mm
Width398 mm369 mm
Depth283 mm259.4 mm
Body materialAluminiumAluminium, Plastic
ColoursBlackSilver
Cooling fans32
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)—58.3 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports32
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortYesNo
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYesNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesNo
Key travel2 mm—
Webcam1,080p1,080p
IR camera (face login)No—
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2.0
Dolby AtmosNoNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare