Gigabyte A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
What A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Memory & storage4.3
Why is A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 300 Hz+82%
- CPU cores10 vs 242.4×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 99 Wh+30%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 5.5 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 30 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 21,412 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,507 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,527 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 873 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 72% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,500 MHz | — |
| Upgradable RAM | No | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | No | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 358.3 mm | — |
| Depth | 262.5 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.68.6vs
Gigabyte A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)8.58.6
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsXMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)