Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023) vs HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (7) and where Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Graphics3.5
3.8Overall performance5.4
7.9Display8.4
5.4Memory & storage2.2
3.4Battery & portability5.2
5.9Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023) | Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 235.5 mm | 234 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 356.3 mm | 313 mm | +43.3 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Brightness600 nits vs 500 nits+20%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 14″+11%
Why is Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,413 vs 12,402+19%
- GPU compute (FP32)9 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS+19%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,074 vs 7,977+13%
- Response time1 ms vs 0.2 ms5×
- Weight1.8 kg vs 1.75 kg+3%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core716 vs 942+32%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- IR camera (face login)No · Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 65 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 9 TFLOPS | 10.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,074 | 7,977 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-12650H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-12650H, Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700H, Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,413 | 12,402 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,252 | 2,385 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 716 | 942 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1620 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 600 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 212 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 1 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 356.3 mm | 313 mm |
| Depth | 235.5 mm | 234 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Creator Z17 A13 RTX 4060 (2023)5.04.8vs
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 7 Gen 8 AMD RX 6800S (2023)5.05.2vs
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAlienware x14 R2 RTX 3050 (2023)5.04.9
vsAcer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)5.15.0
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)5.66.1vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)5.65.0