Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
What TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) does better (6) and where Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Memory & storage2.4
8.4Battery & portability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
| TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) | Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 247 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 24 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 53 Wh+70%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.25 kg+2%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness27 mm vs 24 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,251 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-14650HX | Core 7 250H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 247 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.77.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)6.77.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.8
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)6.66.7
vs
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)4.24.0
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)3.84.2