Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)
What TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) does better (5) and where Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display4.2
3.2Memory & storage2.4
8.4Battery & portability2.6
7.3Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) | Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 267 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 397 mm | −43 mm |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 25 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 49 Wh+84%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.44 kg+11%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness27 mm vs 25 mm+8%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,251 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-14650HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 49 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.44 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 397 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 267 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.76.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5060 (2025)6.76.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)6.76.4
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)7.16.7
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)6.76.7vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.8