Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (5) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display4.2
5.1Memory & storage2.4
7.8Battery & portability9.4
6.2Features & cooling6.4
Why is TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+2%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 130 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,653 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13650HX | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13650HX, Core i9-13980HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,238 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,735 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,097 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.27 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | — |
| Width | 355 mm | — |
| Depth | 252 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.66.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.66.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.66.7vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.66.7vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming F17 RTX 4050 (2023)6.66.2vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming F17 RTX 4070 (2023)6.67.5