NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025) vs Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)

Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025) vs Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)

What TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025) does better (6) and where Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Asus TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025)
6.0Score
6 advantages
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)
7.9Score
9 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
2.3Graphics5.7
3.4Overall performance6.4
6.9Display6.4
7.4Memory & storage9.7
8.2Battery & portability8.6
8.8Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025)Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)
354 × 26927.3358 × 26323
TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025)Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)Difference
Depth269 mm263 mm+6 mm
Width354 mm358 mm−4 mm
Thickness27.3 mm23 mm+4.3 mm
Weight2.2 kg2.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)?

  1. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025): No
  2. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
  3. G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025): No
  4. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
  5. sRGB coverage100% vs 65%+54%
  6. Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%

Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 RTX 3050 (2025)?

  1. GPU compute (FP32)4.3 TFLOPS vs 14.7 TFLOPS3.4×
  2. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light3,652 vs 11,4943.1×
  3. SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 8,000 GB3.9×
  4. RAM (up to)64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
  5. GPU shader cores2,048 vs 3,328+62%
  6. Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  7. Thickness27.3 mm vs 23 mm+19%
  8. SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
  9. Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 3050 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)—85 W
Video memory6 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
GPU shader cores2,0483,328
GPU compute (FP32)4.3 TFLOPS14.7 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light3,65211,494
Processor
ProcessorCore 5 210HRyzen 7 260
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores88
CPU threads12—
Max CPU clock4.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Processor optionsCore i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusCore i7-13620H, Ryzen 7 260
Geekbench 6 multi-core9,153—
Geekbench 6 single-core2,508—
Cinebench 2024 multi-core601—
Display
Screen size16″16″
Resolution1920 × 12001920 × 1200
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%65%
Response time—3 ms
Pixel density142 ppi142 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesNo
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)64 GB96 GB
RAM (base)16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB64 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)2,048 GB8,000 GB
SSD (base)512 GB1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh76 Wh
Power adapter280 W150 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power100 W—
Design & cooling
Weight2.2 kg2.2 kg
Thickness27.3 mm23 mm
Width354 mm358 mm
Depth269 mm263 mm
Body materialAluminium, PlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)—55 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4USB4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports33
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet—1 Gbit/s
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlight—Single-colour RGB
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesNo
Key travel1.7 mm1.7 mm
Webcam1,080p1,080p
IR camera (face login)YesYes
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2.02 speakers
Dolby AtmosYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare