NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023) vs TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)

Asus TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)

What TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (13) and where TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Asus TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023)
7.1Score
13 advantages
Higher score
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)
6.8Score
6 advantages
5.0Graphics5.6
6.5Overall performance5.7
6.0Display3.1
6.3Memory & storage8.6
9.1Battery & portability6.9
6.1Features & cooling5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023)TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)
354 × 25124.9394 × 26422.9
TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023)TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)Difference
Depth251 mm264 mm−13 mm
Width354 mm394 mm−40 mm
Thickness24.9 mm22.9 mm+2 mm
Weight2.2 kg2.6 kg−0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022)?

  1. Geekbench 6 multi-core11,750 vs 9,783+20%
  2. Weight2.2 kg vs 2.6 kg+18%
  3. Response time7 ms vs 34 ms4.9×
  4. Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,097 vs 769+43%
  5. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022): No
  6. USB-C ports2 vs 12×
  7. HDMI 2.1Yes · TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022): No
  8. CPU cores14 vs 12+17%
  9. sRGB coverage100% vs 62%+61%
  10. CPU threads20 vs 16+25%
  11. Pixel density141 ppi vs 127 ppi+11%
  12. Geekbench 6 single-core2,446 vs 2,238+9%

Why is TUF Gaming F17 RTX 3060 (2022) better than TUF Gaming F15 RTX 4050 (2023)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  2. GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,840+50%
  3. GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 14.2 TFLOPS+6%
  4. Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  5. Thickness24.9 mm vs 22.9 mm+9%
  6. Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4050 LaptopGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)140 W140 W
Video memory6 GB6 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
GPU shader cores2,5603,840
GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS14.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,6278,612
Processor
ProcessorCore i7-12700HCore i5-12500H
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores1412
CPU threads2016
Max CPU clock4.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Processor optionsCore i7-12700H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700H, Core i9-13900HCore i5-12500H, Core i7-12700H
Geekbench 6 multi-core11,7509,783
Geekbench 6 single-core2,4462,238
Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,097769
Display
Screen size15.6″17.3″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%62%
Response time7 ms34 ms
DCI-P3 coverage—40%
Pixel density141 ppi127 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB64 GB
RAM (base)8 GB8 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed4,800 MHz4,800 MHz
Max. supported RAM32 GB64 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)4,096 GB4,096 GB
SSD (base)512 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Power adapter240 W240 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesNo
Design & cooling
Weight2.2 kg2.6 kg
Thickness24.9 mm22.9 mm
Width354 mm394 mm
Depth251 mm264 mm
Body materialAluminium, PlasticAluminium, Plastic
ColoursGrayGray
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)—47.9 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports21
USB-A ports22
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1YesNo
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel1.7 mm1.7 mm
Webcam720p720p
IR camera (face login)NoNo
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2.02.0
Dolby AtmosYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare