Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)
What TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (6) and where Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Memory & storage5.5
6.5Battery & portability8.8
5.6Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)
| TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) | Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 262 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 395 mm | = |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)?
- SSD (up to)8,000 GB vs 2,000 GB4×
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 64 GB+50%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022): No
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Thickness25 mm vs 26 mm+4%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+4%
Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 64 GB8×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight2.6 kg vs 2.3 kg+13%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SSD (base)500 GB vs 2,000 GB4×
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | — |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,820 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,408 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,188 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 748 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 500 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)6.07.4
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)5.47.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Crosshair 16 Max HX E2 RTX 5070 (2026)7.48.3vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)7.47.6
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)8.37.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Thin 15 B13 RTX 3050 (2024)7.44.6