Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (16) and where Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Graphics4.4
5.0Overall performance4.3
3.5Display8.5
7.1Memory & storage5.4
6.5Battery & portability9.3
5.6Features & cooling6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)
| TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) | Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 249.1 mm | +14.9 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 327.5 mm | +67.5 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 20.8 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2.9×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 105 W+33%
- RAM (up to)48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 74 Wh+22%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,129 vs 7,371+10%
- RAM (base)48 GB vs 16 GB3×
- SSD (base)6,000 GB vs 512 GB11.7×
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023): No
Why is Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Weight2.6 kg vs 1.75 kg+49%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Brightness250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
- Response time7 ms vs 1 ms7×
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Thickness25 mm vs 20.8 mm+20%
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 234 ppi+84%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 11.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,129 | 7,371 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,009 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,425 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 736 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 14.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 234 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 6,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 6,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 74 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 20.8 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 327.5 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 249.1 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Gray | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | 52.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)5.46.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)6.16.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.96.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.1