Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (16) and where Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Graphics3.3
5.0Overall performance4.8
3.5Display8.6
7.1Memory & storage4.9
6.5Battery & portability4.1
5.6Features & cooling5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)
| TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) | Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 260.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 363.4 mm | +31.6 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26.7 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 95 W+47%
- SSD (up to)6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2.9×
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS+70%
- RAM (up to)48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,129 vs 5,506+48%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- RAM (base)48 GB vs 16 GB3×
- SSD (base)6,000 GB vs 512 GB11.7×
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 2,048+25%
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023): No
Why is Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Brightness250 nits vs 350 nits+40%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- Weight2.6 kg vs 2.5 kg+4%
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- USB-A ports2 vs 42×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- sRGB coverage62% vs 100%+61%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 189 ppi+49%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 95 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 7.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,129 | 5,506 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | Ryzen 5 7645HX, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 7745HX, Ryzen 9 7845HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,497 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,847 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 794 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 70% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 6,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 6,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26.7 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 363.4 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 260.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Blue |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | 53.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)5.46.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)6.16.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.96.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Pulse 17 RTX 4050 (2023)6.15.8