- pan.tf
- Compare
- TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) vs IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (19) and where IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Graphics3.8
5.0Overall performance3.5
3.5Display2.3
7.1Memory & storage8.6
6.5Battery & portability7.8
5.6Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)
| TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) | IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 266.4 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 359.6 mm | +35.4 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 21.8 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) better than IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 85 W+65%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 71 Wh+27%
- MUX switchYes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023): No
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS+23%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- SSD (up to)6,000 GB vs 4,096 GB+46%
- Response time7 ms vs 19 ms2.7×
- DCI-P3 coverage100% vs 39%2.6×
- RAM (base)48 GB vs 8 GB6×
- SSD (base)6,000 GB vs 256 GB23.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,129 vs 7,686+6%
Why is IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)48 GB vs 64 GB+33%
- Weight2.6 kg vs 2.32 kg+12%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Thickness25 mm vs 21.8 mm+15%
- Fan noise (max. load)57.2 dB vs 49.4 dB+16%
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 141 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 85 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 10.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,129 | 7,686 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 5 6600H |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | Ryzen 5 6600H, Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 8,766 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,010 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 568 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | 58% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 19 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 39% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | No |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 48 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 48 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 6,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 6,000 GB | 256 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.32 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 21.8 mm |
| Width | 395 mm | 359.6 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 266.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | White, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | 49.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)5.46.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)6.16.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.96.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)6.15.6