Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) vs MSI Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) does better (13) and where Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Graphics5.4
3.6Overall performance6.4
4.9Display2.7
2.9Memory & storage3.3
8.9Battery & portability2.2
7.5Features & cooling3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) | Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 273 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 398 mm | −44 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 54 Wh+68%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.7 kg+23%
- CPU cores12 vs 8+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 26 ms8.7×
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024): No
- sRGB coverage100% vs 59%+69%
- Fan noise (max. load)39.4 dB vs 59.8 dB+52%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 105 W+17%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,799 vs 10,294+32%
- GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS+27%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Thickness26 mm vs 25 mm+4%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,799 | 10,294 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 12 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,581 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,703 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 968 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 59% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 26 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 273 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 59.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.45.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)5.47.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)5.46.1
vsAcer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)5.65.4
vsAcer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)5.25.4